Sheff v. O’Neill is a landmark civil rights lawsuit that seeks educational equality. The Center for Children’s Advocacy continues to represent the plaintiffs to advocate for Connecticut to uphold the constitutional rights of children in Hartford to an equal educational opportunity. Click for legal documents and history.
Alternative Education programs disproportionately serve children of color and operate with little accountability and inferior educational supports. Working with education officials, legislators, teachers and families, the CCA spearheaded reform, writing and securing passage of legislation that requires state evaluation and monitoring of programs. CCA’s Racial Justice Project is monitoring adherence in multiple cities and working with the SDE on statewide guidelines.
Alicia B: Substandard alternative education offered to expelled children disproportionately affects students of color and violates equal protection guarantees of both the state and U.S. constitutions. Alicia B. names Bloomfield, Hartford and Manchester’s public school districts, the state Department of Education and the state Board of Education as defendants.
Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
Norwalk Public Schools failed to provide FAPE to students as a result of violations of Child Find obligations under the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). Center for Children’s Advocacy, Norwalk Special Education Attorney Robin Keller, and SEEK (Special Education Equity for Kids of CT), filed a complaint with the State Department of Education alleging systemic and pervasive violation of federal and state law.
Bridgeport Public Schools failed to provide FAPE to students as a result of violations of Child Find obligations under the IDEA. Child Find requires that at the beginning of each school year, districts must have an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) in effect for each child with a disability. Special education and related services must conform to the IEP for the individual student.
Suspension and Expulsion
New Visions: Hartford Public Schools systematically and pervasively denies expelled special education students their rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) by failing to provide special education and related services to confer meaningful educational benefit.
Discrimination in Admissions
CT Technical High School System; Center for Children’s Advocacy and Greater Hartford Legal Aid filed a complaint against the Connecticut Technical High School System alleging that CTHSS applies admissions policies in ways that discriminate against students with disabilities, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
CCA attorneys work with children and youth of all ages to be sure they are treated fairly and receive the supports they need for academic achievement. Every child must have the opportunity to stay in school and graduate.
Children who need special education and related services must be identified early so they get the support they need. Exclusion from school, or inability to access the curriculum, has tremendous negative impact on a child’s academic career.
The exclusion of our youngest learners, from preschool through grade 2, continues to be a particular concern in Connecticut and nationwide. In many cases, disproportionality is even more pronounced in this age group. Young boys of color tend to be excluded at rates much higher than their total representation.
We must create an environment where educators recognize trauma that can cause misbehavior. CCA works to confront cultural bias and promote mental wellness because we know that childhood experiences like violence and family dysfunction can predict academic failure.
We advocate for new law to improve systems and policies. Connecticut law written by the Center for Children’s Advocacy includes:
The Center filed two complaints with the State Department of Education against Bridgeport Public Schools to assure delivery of services to special education students, accusing Bridgeport of failing to provide individual plans for its most vulnerable students, asking the state to intercede. The Complaints detail numerous examples of neglect.
The Center’s seminars present statewide experts on important educational issues.
Education and Special Education